The Edwin C. Bearss/Chris Calkins book on the battle of Five
Forks has required revision for some time.
Michael J. McCarthy’s book Confederate
Waterloo gives an updated and more accurate picture of the fight without
going much beyond the overview provided by A. Wilson Greene in his Breaking the Back of the Rebellion. The reason is that McCarthy is more
interested in exploring the subsequent struggle of Maj. Gen. Gouverneur Kemble
Warren to demonstrate the injustice of his relief at the hands of Maj. Gen.
Phillip Sheridan immediately after Warren won the battle. The summary of the fighting is good,
though I disagree with McCarthy’s figures on Confederate prisoners after having
actually counted them—his figures are high, 4,500 as opposed to the 2,500 I
counted in The Petersburg Campaign, assisted by the research of Bryce Suderow.
The main problem with the book is that McCarthy doesn’t know
enough about the Siege of Petersburg to put Five Forks in perspective. He keeps insisting that Five Forks decided
the Siege. It most certainly did not. The April 2 breakthrough by VI Corps ended
the Siege, as A. Wilson Green has observed.
As I’ve pointed out in every book I’ve written on the Siege, page 922 of
The Wartime Papers of Robert E. Lee makes
clear that Pickett’s failure on March 31, 1865 to evict Sheridan from Dinwiddie
Court House would have been decisive except for the slow response of Lee’s
civilian superiors (Secretary of War Breckenridge and President Davis) to Lee’s
request to evacuate. Even on April 2, in
the absence of approval from above to evacuate, Lee was marshaling forces to
strike Sheridan similar to the way that Lee struck Hancock at Reams Station on
August 25, 1864. Unfortunately for Lee,
Grant was not sick again as he was on August 25, 1864, leaving Meade to defend
with his extraordinary passivity. Grant
defended by attacking, and ended the Siege.
Likewise, McCarthy doesn't understand the depth of
bad blood between Warren and his superiors.
Major General George Gordon Meade does not seem to have forgiven Warren
for failing to attack at Mine Run in December 1863, even though Warren was
justified in calling off the attack.
Grant and Meade also held against Warren his failure to seize Petersburg
in August 1864, even though he cut the Weldon Railroad.
Once we are finished with the actual fighting, McCarthy’s
real story begins—how Warren obtained a court of inquiry and how that
proceeded. This part of the book is riveting
and it is hard to set down. Despite the
protestations of Generals Grant, Sherman and Sheridan, as well as the Army’s
chief lawyer, to the contrary, it appears that the unfortunate
Warren established his case beyond a reasonable doubt. Grant carelessly set up Warren to disappoint
Sheridan and then invited Sheridan if disappointed to relieve Warren, with
predictable results.